| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, dandl <david(at)andl(dot)org>, 'Adam Brusselback' <adambrusselback(at)gmail(dot)com>, 'Joy Arulraj' <jarulraj(at)cs(dot)cmu(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | 'kang joni' <kangjoni76(at)gmail(dot)com>, 'Dmitry Igrishin' <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres |
| Date: | 2016-08-16 15:52:39 |
| Message-ID: | dc660b8e-bf78-9653-c5c1-39331f050d58@iki.fi |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 08/16/2016 05:47 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> I realize there's little technical reason why we *need* C++ support. The
> level if discipline applied to our codebase negates some of the benefits
> of C++. But maintaining the discipline takes a lot of time and effort,
> and makes it more difficult to attract new contributors.
I suspect that it would take as much discipline to keep a C++ codebase
readable, as the current C codebase. If not more.
- Heikki
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Travers | 2016-08-16 16:17:49 | Re: Any reasons for 'DO' statement not returning result? |
| Previous Message | Joy Arulraj | 2016-08-16 15:45:04 | Re: C++ port of Postgres |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yury Zhuravlev | 2016-08-16 16:23:11 | Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2016-08-16 15:48:41 | Re: PSA: Systemd will kill PostgreSQL |