Re: Draft of 9.2 beta announcement, please revise/improve

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Draft of 9.2 beta announcement, please revise/improve
Date: 2012-05-07 17:04:57
Message-ID: dc23a52ccd8b829a491cc5da0824f561@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> in performance, vertical and horizontal scalability.

Reads awkward.

> Major performance and scalability advances ready to be tested in this version include:

s/ready to be tested//; ## Makes them sound very fragile and untested

> * JSON data support, permitting building hybrid document-relational databases
> * Range types, supporting new types of calendar, time-series and analytic applications
> * Multiple improvments to make database migrations easier

Can we add details to that last bullet? It's pretty vague in contrast
to the previous two.

> For a full listing of the ready-to-test features in version 9.2 beta

s/ready-to-test//;

> We depend on our community test the next verson in order to guarantee that
> it is high-performance and bug-free.

- From a marketing standpoint, that's a scary sentence.

/twocents

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201205071304
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAk+oAJUACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjrawCfWa2oW099JIoeKNOMDd2pDw8R
lY4AoJRvjP74XVHgHUj93E7g/+GmVPxG
=v+NG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-05-07 17:06:28 Re: Draft of 9.2 beta announcement, please revise/improve
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2012-05-07 16:58:29 San Francisco pgDay December 8, Usenix LISA CfP