Re: Corrupted btree index on HEAD because of covering indexes

From: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Corrupted btree index on HEAD because of covering indexes
Date: 2018-04-19 19:47:02
Message-ID: db01c137-120e-6732-2d91-38bee9a8d3ee@sigaev.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I also think that we could have better conventional regression test
> coverage here.

I tried to minimize Michael's test case and add it to patch.

--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

Attachment Content-Type Size
vacuum_nbtree-v2.patch text/x-patch 2.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2018-04-19 19:55:40 Re: Built-in connection pooling
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-04-19 19:40:17 Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables