Re: pgcrypto/des tests fail on riscv64 due to clang's code generation anomaly

From: "Greg Burd" <greg(at)burd(dot)me>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Michael Paquier" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Alexander Lakhin" <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Thomas Munro" <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pgcrypto/des tests fail on riscv64 due to clang's code generation anomaly
Date: 2026-03-16 12:13:55
Message-ID: db01b708-90da-4f52-ae5a-7e9da44ffa7c@app.fastmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Sun, Mar 15, 2026, at 9:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2026 at 02:00:00PM +0200, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
>>> adding -march=rv64gcv to CFLAGS makes clang generate different (wrong?)
>>> code for crypt-des.c. Namely, having reproduced the diff locally, with
>>> this debugging addition:
>>> when the code compiled with CC=clang-20 CPPFLAGS="-march=rv64gcv".
>
>> Thanks for the detailed investigation. I was puzzled by it myself for
>> a couple of hours, and did not see something else than a broken
>> compiler here..
>
> Seems like this might be worth a bug report to the clang people.

Thanks Alexander for digging and a solid report of the issue, and Michael for spending some time on this, and Tom for chiming in as well. I agree this looks like a compiler issue. I know that Thomas (added/CC'ed) you've posted bugs against clang before, any thoughts on this one?

>
> regards, tom lane

best.

-greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2026-03-16 12:21:08 Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Previous Message Alena Rybakina 2026-03-16 12:11:06 Re: Vacuum statistics