From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: language cleanups in code and docs |
Date: | 2020-06-16 22:59:25 |
Message-ID: | da62b20a-b483-6cd1-0c35-07fbfd4b4838@pgmasters.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/16/20 6:27 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2020-06-16 17:14:57 -0400, David Steele wrote:
>> On 6/15/20 2:22 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>
>>> 0008: docs: WIP multi-master rephrasing.
>>> I like neither the new nor the old language much. I'd welcome input.
>>
>> Why not multi-primary?
>
> My understanding of primary is that there really can't be two things
> that are primary in relation to each other.
Well, I think the same is true for multi-master and that's pretty common.
> active/active is probably
> the most common term in use besides multi-master.
Works for me and can always be updated later if we come up with
something better. At least active-active will be easier to search for.
>> One last thing -- are we considering back-patching any/all of this?
>
> I don't think there's a good reason to do so.
I was thinking of back-patching pain but if you don't think that's an
issue then I'm not worried about it.
> Thanks for the look!
You are welcome!
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2020-06-16 23:31:05 | Re: elog(DEBUG2 in SpinLocked section. |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2020-06-16 22:27:10 | Re: language cleanups in code and docs |