Re: 回复:Re: Cache relation sizes?

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, 陈佳昕(步真) <buzhen(dot)cjx(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>
Subject: Re: 回复:Re: Cache relation sizes?
Date: 2021-03-03 13:39:54
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Thomas,

On 1/18/21 10:42 PM, 陈佳昕(步真) wrote:
> I want to share a patch with you, I change the replacement algorithm
> from fifo to a simple lru.

What do you think of this change?

Also, your patch set from [1] no longer applies (and of course this
latest patch is confusing the tester as well).

Marking Waiting on Author.



In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2021-03-03 13:47:38 Re: authtype parameter in libpq
Previous Message David Steele 2021-03-03 13:21:37 Re: Huge memory consumption on partitioned table with FKs