| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, 陈佳昕(步真) <buzhen(dot)cjx(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: 回复：Re: Cache relation sizes? |
| Date: | 2021-03-03 13:39:54 |
| Message-ID: | da1699a9-d75f-1e36-08a7-c78e8afddc22@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Thomas,
On 1/18/21 10:42 PM, 陈佳昕(步真) wrote:
> I want to share a patch with you, I change the replacement algorithm
> from fifo to a simple lru.
What do you think of this change?
Also, your patch set from [1] no longer applies (and of course this
latest patch is confusing the tester as well).
Marking Waiting on Author.
Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-03-03 13:47:38 | Re: authtype parameter in libpq |
| Previous Message | David Steele | 2021-03-03 13:21:37 | Re: Huge memory consumption on partitioned table with FKs |