| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Fredouille <daniel(dot)fredouille(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: unnest multirange, returned order |
| Date: | 2023-10-27 06:48:49 |
| Message-ID: | d957c3c8b949c1d8602eb4a20557c1cd8243242b.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2023-10-13 at 15:33 -0400, Daniel Fredouille wrote:
> sorry it took me some time to reply. Yes, the patch is perfect if this is indeed the behavior.
I'm sending a reply to the hackers list so that I can add the patch to the commitfest.
Tiny as the patch is, I don't want it to fall between the cracks.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2023-10-27 06:58:02 | Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2023-10-26 21:59:42 | Re: 19.9. Secure TCP/IP Connections with SSL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-10-27 06:52:25 | Re: "38.10.10. Shared Memory and LWLocks" may require a clarification |
| Previous Message | vignesh C | 2023-10-27 06:39:27 | Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication |