Re: Remove one last occurrence of "replication slave" in comments

From: ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker )
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove one last occurrence of "replication slave" in comments
Date: 2019-06-19 17:04:27
Message-ID: d8jzhmdwlpg.fsf@dalvik.ping.uio.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:

> A Twitter thread today regarding the use of master/slave [1] made me curious
> and so I had a look. It seems that commit a1ef920e27ba6ab3602aaf6d6751d8628
> replaced most instances but missed at least one which is fixed in the attached.
>
> cheers ./daniel

There were some more master/slave references in the plpgsql foreign key
tests, which the attached chages to base/leaf instead.

I didn't touch the last mention of "slave", in the pltcl code, because
it's calling the Tcl_CreateSlave() API function.

- ilmari
--
"The surreality of the universe tends towards a maximum" -- Skud's Law
"Never formulate a law or axiom that you're not prepared to live with
the consequences of." -- Skud's Meta-Law

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Remove-master-slave-usage-from-plpgsql-tests.patch text/x-diff 3.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2019-06-19 17:46:46 Re: idea: log_statement_sample_rate - bottom limit for sampling
Previous Message Thom Brown 2019-06-19 16:06:51 Re: SQL/JSON path issues/questions