Re: Remove one last occurrence of "replication slave" in comments

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove one last occurrence of "replication slave" in comments
Date: 2019-08-21 10:06:21
Message-ID: 7a99e19f-ed6a-e93b-cd1b-668a4804126d@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-06-19 19:04, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> There were some more master/slave references in the plpgsql foreign key
> tests, which the attached chages to base/leaf instead.

base/leaf doesn't sound like a good pair. I committed it with root/leaf
instead.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2019-08-21 10:26:04 Re: Optimization of vacuum for logical replication
Previous Message Bernd Helmle 2019-08-21 09:34:34 Re: Optimization of vacuum for logical replication