Re: Remove one last occurrence of "replication slave" in comments

From: ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker )
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove one last occurrence of "replication slave" in comments
Date: 2019-08-21 13:54:25
Message-ID: d8jtvaasjxq.fsf@dalvik.ping.uio.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:

> On 2019-06-19 19:04, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>> There were some more master/slave references in the plpgsql foreign key
>> tests, which the attached chages to base/leaf instead.
>
> base/leaf doesn't sound like a good pair. I committed it with root/leaf
> instead.

Thanks! You're right, that is a better name pair.

- ilmari
--
"A disappointingly low fraction of the human race is,
at any given time, on fire." - Stig Sandbeck Mathisen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-08-21 13:55:26 Re: "ago" times on buildfarm status page
Previous Message Asif Rehman 2019-08-21 13:47:04 WIP/PoC for parallel backup