Re: [PATCH] Tab complete EXECUTE FUNCTION for CREATE (EVENT) TRIGGER

From: ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org (Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?=)
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Tab complete EXECUTE FUNCTION for CREATE (EVENT) TRIGGER
Date: 2018-10-26 10:15:19
Message-ID: d8jin1pnhe0.fsf@dalvik.ping.uio.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 09:31:48AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> Committed 0001 now which adds tab completion for CREATE TRIGGER.
>
>> And 0002 is committed as well. Thanks for the patches!

Thanks for reviewing and committing!

> The committed patches look sane to me, but should we back-patch into 11?
> This isn't quite a bug fix maybe, but it's inconsistent if v11 server &
> docs recommend this syntax while v11 psql doesn't produce it.

I was going to suggest backpatching it, as I consider it a bug in the
original implementation, if not critical. Making it harder for people
to use the recommended syntax than the deprecated one is not nice.

> regards, tom lane

- ilmari
--
"The surreality of the universe tends towards a maximum" -- Skud's Law
"Never formulate a law or axiom that you're not prepared to live with
the consequences of." -- Skud's Meta-Law

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-10-26 10:20:13 Re: Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index?
Previous Message Amit Langote 2018-10-26 10:08:44 Re: Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index?