Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org (Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?=) writes:
>> I just noticed that when contrib/seg was converted to V1 calling
>> convention (commit 389bb2818f4), the PG_GETARG_SEG_P() macro got defined
>> in terms of PG_GETARG_POINTER(). But it itself calls DatumGetPointer(),
>> so shouldn't it be using PG_GETARG_DATUM()?
>
> Yup, I agree. Pushed.
Thanks!
> regards, tom lane
- ilmari
--
"The surreality of the universe tends towards a maximum" -- Skud's Law
"Never formulate a law or axiom that you're not prepared to live with
the consequences of." -- Skud's Meta-Law