Re: [PATCH] Add `headerscheck` run_target to meson

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Miłosz Bieniek <bieniek(dot)milosz0(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add `headerscheck` run_target to meson
Date: 2026-03-23 07:00:55
Message-ID: d7e02e4d-df63-422a-a865-44e321787fb3@eisentraut.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 18.03.26 16:36, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 at 14:59, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>> On 18.03.26 11:56, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>
>>> Committed that, but without the regular expression changes. I don't
>>> understand why those would be needed. Please provide more information
>>> if necessary. It worked for me without it.
>
> It is working now. I can't reproduce the problem, it looks like it is
> already fixed.
>
>
>> I need another tweak for the cpluspluscheck.
>>
>> In meson, the distribution of the include flags between CPPFLAGS,
>> CFLAGS, and CXXFLAGS ends up being a bit different, and we need to get a
>> few -I options from CXXFLAGS in my case.
>>
>> I have attached two different variants for how to do this. The first
>> one just gets the -D and -I flags from CXXFLAGS. This preserves most of
>> the existing behavior. The second aligns more with how CFLAGS works and
>> removes the ability to override CXXFLAGS from the command line. This is
>> probably now better since we have more support for getting correct CXX
>> and CXXFLAGS in the build system. But it might be a change for some users.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> I think we can go with the second variant first. If there is a
> complaint, we can then consider switching to the first one. Does that
> sound good? Also, second patch probably needs to remove lines below
> from the src/tools/pginclude/README:
>
> ```
> If you are using a non-g++-compatible C++ compiler, you may need to
> override the script's CXXFLAGS setting by setting a suitable environment
> value.
> ```

Ok, done that way.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shveta malik 2026-03-23 07:05:02 Re: Skipping schema changes in publication
Previous Message John Naylor 2026-03-23 07:00:50 Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc?