Re: Containerized development environment for pgweb

From: Yogesh Sharma <yogesh(dot)sharma(at)catprosystems(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Containerized development environment for pgweb
Date: 2024-06-27 12:25:17
Message-ID: d7ca5025-4d0b-492d-9b7d-50d72a85033b@catprosystems.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On 6/26/24 04:23, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 10:07 AM Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> wrote:
>
> On 2024-06-21 23:08, Yogesh Sharma wrote:
> <snip>
> > docker-compose.yml - to create proper dependency between python and
> > postgres container
>
> This one's using PG 16:
>
>    image: postgres:16
>
> Does anyone know if the PG infrastructure uses PG 16 too?
>
> Asking because it'd make sense for them to match, just in case. :)
>
>
> It also is on python 3.7 which should be 3.9 to match what's deployed.
> In general, I'd recommend starting off the debian bullseye container
> instead of the python specific one -- that's what's used in the
> production deployments, so it makes sense to keep to the same.
> That way it could also be using the same versions of the debian
> packages for all requirements (basically everything except Django
> itself), to ensure it's exactly the same.
>
> //Magnus

Which Debian release is used by PG infrastructure?

--
Kind Regards,
Yogesh Sharma
PostgreSQL, Linux, and Networking Expert
Open Source Enthusiast and Advocate
PostgreSQL Contributors Team @ RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2024-06-27 13:34:23 Re: Containerized development environment for pgweb
Previous Message Jeremy Schneider 2024-06-26 17:20:04 Re: seattle user group website