From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Should we eliminate or reduce HUP from docs? |
Date: | 2017-03-10 19:57:30 |
Message-ID: | d71e3fb4-6413-5f09-b62c-98e7bef477e8@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
I am a bad speaker, I am writing a talk three weeks before the
conference (as opposed to on the plane). I noticed in the docs we still
reference the passing of SIGHUP for reloading conf file but we now have
pg_reload_conf();
It seems the use of pg_reload_conf() would provide a better canonical
interface to our users. Especially those users who are not used to
interacting with the OS (Windows, Oracle etc...) for databases.
Sincerely,
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-03-10 20:01:53 | Re: Should we eliminate or reduce HUP from docs? |
Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2017-03-10 19:57:00 | Re: ANALYZE command progress checker |