Re: partitioned tables referenced by FKs

From: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: partitioned tables referenced by FKs
Date: 2019-03-27 14:22:21
Message-ID: d70b6616-a4fd-3fc8-ae27-5907496fc535@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 3/26/19 5:39 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> As I said before, I'm thinking of getting rid of the whole business of
>>> checking partitions on the referenced side of an FK at DROP time, and
>>> instead jut forbid the DROP completely if any FKs reference an ancestor
>>> of that partition.
>>
>> Will that allow `DROP TABLE parted_pk CASCADE` to succeed even if
>> partitions still contain referenced data? I suppose that's the example
>> you cited upthread as a bug that remains to be solved.
>
> That's the idea, yes, it should do that: only allow a DROP of a
> partition referenced by an FK if the topmost constraint is also being
> dropped. Maybe this means I need to get rid of 0002 completely. But I
> haven't got to doing that yet.
>

I think that is ok, if doc/src/sgml/ref/drop_table.sgml is updated with
a description of how CASCADE works in this scenario.

Best regards,
Jesper

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-03-27 14:23:06 Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2019-03-27 14:20:05 Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system