| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: TODO list (was Re: Contributing with code) |
| Date: | 2018-01-03 16:42:18 |
| Message-ID: | d67b6d4c-3451-b178-ef6e-b80ac5d43dbc@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/3/18 11:10, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> This text was added by [1] as saying:
> > This list contains '''some known PostgreSQL bugs and feature
> > requests''' and we hope it contains all such
> (before this, it said "all known Pg bugs" which seemed too optimistic,
> so the correction was in a good direction) and later amended by [2] to
> the current wording ("This list contains '''known PostgreSQL bugs and
> feature requests''' and we hope it is complete"). I think [1]'s wording
> was okay, but the other one not so much.
>
> I rewrote the text. I thought about presenting my draft here first, but
> hey, it's a wiki.
I went through it just now as well. I have cleaned up the formatting a
bit and removed some entries that were done.
It's not bad really, as long as the intro text is more appropriate.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-01-03 17:00:55 | Re: TODO list (was Re: Contributing with code) |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2018-01-03 16:40:49 | Re: TODO list (was Re: Contributing with code) |