| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New partitioning - some feedback |
| Date: | 2017-07-12 02:53:05 |
| Message-ID: | d6511ad5-a99c-5656-7964-080be3b8e431@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017/07/11 18:57, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:16 AM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
>> So whatever we land on needs to mention partition_of and
>> has_partitions. Is that latter just its immediate partitions?
>> Recursion all the way down? Somewhere in between?
>>
>
> We have patches proposed to address some of those concerns at [1]
>
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFjFpRcs5fOSfaAGAjT5C6=YvDD7MRx3knf_SpB5DQZOJgjerA@mail.gmail.com
ISTM, David is talking about the "list tables" (bare \d without any
pattern) case. That is, listing partitioned tables as of type
"partitioned table" instead of "table" as we currently do. The linked
patch, OTOH, is for "describe table" (\d <object_name_pattern>) case.
Thanks,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2017-07-12 03:00:04 | Re: New partitioning - some feedback |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-07-12 02:19:51 | Minor style cleanup in tab-complete.c |