Re: a question about data corruption

From: "Jacek Rembisz" <jacek(dot)rembisz(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: a question about data corruption
Date: 2008-06-26 08:40:12
Message-ID: d5e6d13d0806260140j393c7514l4060ebdfa855a906@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

2008/6/26 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:

> No, nothing like that has ever been reported in any released PG
> version. If the substituted blocks were from non-Postgres files
> then I think you could write off the idea of a PG bug entirely.
> It could still be a software issue though.

Thank you for a quick response. The issue is clear now.
The machine didn't pass a hardware test.

Best regards,
Jacek Rembisz

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2008-06-26 10:08:16 Re: what are rules for?
Previous Message Panagiotis Papadakos 2008-06-26 07:34:05 Array problem