| From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josef Šimánek <josef(dot)simanek(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Don't block HOT update by BRIN index |
| Date: | 2021-12-06 00:51:47 |
| Message-ID: | d57873f2-f05a-2c74-d1b6-b0e702f7ecec@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/5/21 21:16, Tom Lane wrote:
> Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
>> brin.sql's new brin_hot test is failing sometimes.
>> Evidently because:
>> | 2021-12-01 04:02:01.096 CET [61a6e587.3106b1:4] LOG: wait_for_hot_stats delayed 33.217301 seconds
>> It seems like maybe the UDP packet lost to the stats collector got lost ?
>> It fails less than 10% of the time here, probably depending on load.
>
> Oh, geez. *Please* let us not add another regression failure mode
> like the ones that afflict stats.sql. We do not need a doubling
> of that failure rate. I suggest just removing this test.
>
Whooops. Agreed, I'll get rid of that test.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2021-12-06 00:56:20 | Re: Is ssl_crl_file "SSL server cert revocation list"? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-12-06 00:41:14 | Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions |