Re: Naming projects for Postgresql ONLY.

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Jean Baro <jfbaro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-novice(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Naming projects for Postgresql ONLY.
Date: 2021-11-17 15:42:05
Message-ID: d43261aba0d82fad7d890b4f2992072ab9f5dab1.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

On Tue, 2021-11-16 at 13:39 -0300, Jean Baro wrote:
> I am working on a project for PERSON (Lead, Prospect and Customer) deduplication that
> is done using 100% Postgresql capabilities (and its standard extensions present in AWS,
> GCP and Azure as well). Once extensively tested and robust enough I am planning on
> releasing it as Open Source (probably under PG License). 
>
> To ensure people looking into this know it's a Postgresql only solution I was considering naming it pg_person_dedupe or something on those lines.
>
> Please, am I allowed to use pg_** as the name of this open source project?

I see no problem with that.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean Baro 2021-11-17 16:46:44 Re: Naming projects for Postgresql ONLY.
Previous Message Jean Baro 2021-11-16 16:39:55 Naming projects for Postgresql ONLY.