Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog
Date: 2016-08-29 00:45:47
Message-ID: d42ab8e1-8573-abf3-f63a-1301c46aedd9@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/26/16 4:08 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Splitting of ephemeral data seems to have a benefit, the rest seems more
> like rather noisy busywork to me.

People accidentally blowing away pg_clog or pg_xlog is a pretty common
occurrence, and I don't think there's all that many tools that reference
them. I think it's well worth renaming them.

I actually like the idea of re-organizing everything too. It would be
easy to include a tool that puts symlinks in place to all the original
locations if you need that.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2016-08-29 00:49:33 Re: Why is a newly created index contains the invalid LSN?
Previous Message Kouhei Kaigai 2016-08-29 00:34:14 comment fix for CUSTOMPATH_* flags