Re: Monitoring roles patch

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Monitoring roles patch
Date: 2017-03-24 04:53:12
Message-ID: d3e2e808-50fd-daca-fc07-8863930cae7d@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/22/17 09:17, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> If we do it via GRANTs instead, then users can easily extend it.
> The intent here is that users will *also* be able to do it via GRANTs if
> they wish to.

But why not do it with GRANTs in the first place then?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2017-03-24 05:11:47 Re: segfault in hot standby for hash indexes
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2017-03-24 04:36:08 Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers