|From:||David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>|
|To:||Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>|
|Cc:||Krasiyan Andreev <krasiyan(at)gmail(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: Implement <null treatment> for window functions|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On 3/18/21 12:03 PM, Vik Fearing wrote:
> On 3/18/21 4:12 PM, David Steele wrote:
>> Hi Vik,
>> On 1/11/21 5:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I started to look through this patch...
>> I see you moved this patch to PG15. If you won't be working on the patch
>> in this CF
> Correct. I won't be working on this again until I finish my review of
> the system versioning patch.
>> perhaps it would be better to close it as Returned with
>> Feedback for now and reopen it when you have a new patch?
> If that is preferred over moving it to PG15, then no objection.
It is, because it means it doesn't need to be looked at again until you
have had time to work on it.
> As long
> as people don't think I've abandoned it.
This declaration should prevent that.
|Next Message||Peter Geoghegan||2021-03-18 16:38:05||Re: a verbose option for autovacuum|
|Previous Message||Vik Fearing||2021-03-18 16:03:34||Re: Implement <null treatment> for window functions|