Re: Implement <null treatment> for window functions

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Krasiyan Andreev <krasiyan(at)gmail(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Implement <null treatment> for window functions
Date: 2021-03-18 16:36:09
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/18/21 12:03 PM, Vik Fearing wrote:
> On 3/18/21 4:12 PM, David Steele wrote:
>> Hi Vik,
>> On 1/11/21 5:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I started to look through this patch...
>> I see you moved this patch to PG15. If you won't be working on the patch
>> in this CF
> Correct. I won't be working on this again until I finish my review of
> the system versioning patch.
>> perhaps it would be better to close it as Returned with
>> Feedback for now and reopen it when you have a new patch?
> If that is preferred over moving it to PG15, then no objection.

It is, because it means it doesn't need to be looked at again until you
have had time to work on it.

> As long
> as people don't think I've abandoned it.

This declaration should prevent that.


In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-03-18 16:38:05 Re: a verbose option for autovacuum
Previous Message Vik Fearing 2021-03-18 16:03:34 Re: Implement <null treatment> for window functions