Re: [PATCH] Completed unaccent dictionary with many missing characters

From: Przemysław Sztoch <przemyslaw(at)sztoch(dot)pl>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Completed unaccent dictionary with many missing characters
Date: 2022-06-15 11:01:37
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Two fixes (bad comment and fixed Latin-ASCII.xml).

Michael Paquier wrote on 17.05.2022 09:11:
> On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 09:44:15PM +0200, Przemysław Sztoch wrote:
>> Tom, I disagree with you because many similar numerical conversions are
>> already taking place, e.g. 1/2, 1/4...
> This part sounds like a valid argument to me. unaccent.rules does
> already the conversion of some mathematical signs, and the additions
> proposed in the patch don't look that weird to me. I agree with Peter
> and Przemysław that this is reasonable.
> --
> Michael

Przemysław Sztoch | Mobile +48 509 99 00 66

Attachment Content-Type Size
unaccent-missed-chars-v2.patch text/plain 13.7 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Verite 2022-06-15 11:50:14 Re: Add header support to text format and matching feature
Previous Message Christoph Heiss 2022-06-15 10:45:07 [PATCH] Add sortsupport for range types and btree_gist