Re: [PATCH] Completed unaccent dictionary with many missing characters

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Przemysław Sztoch <przemyslaw(at)sztoch(dot)pl>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Completed unaccent dictionary with many missing characters
Date: 2022-05-17 07:11:40
Message-ID: YoNKrEVmEJQHGUmA@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 09:44:15PM +0200, Przemysław Sztoch wrote:
> Tom, I disagree with you because many similar numerical conversions are
> already taking place, e.g. 1/2, 1/4...

This part sounds like a valid argument to me. unaccent.rules does
already the conversion of some mathematical signs, and the additions
proposed in the patch don't look that weird to me. I agree with Peter
and Przemysław that this is reasonable.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2022-05-17 07:15:35 Re: has_wal_read_bug
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2022-05-17 06:52:45 Re: bogus: logical replication rows/cols combinations