Re: Logical replication in the same cluster

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logical replication in the same cluster
Date: 2017-06-09 21:16:08
Message-ID: d36cd09a-5cc3-490f-9cc0-9954e25795db@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/27/17 15:06, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 4/27/17 04:08, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> Note that the workaround for all of this is not all that complex, you do
>> same thing (create slot manually) you'd do for physical replication with
>> slots.
>
> Maybe we should just document this issue for now.

done

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-06-09 21:19:31 Re: PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2017-06-09 21:06:40 logical replication NOTICE "synchronized table states"