| From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Matsumura, Ryo" <matsumura(dot)ryo(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Takahashi, Ryohei" <r(dot)takahashi_2(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Ideriha, Takeshi" <ideriha(dot)takeshi(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Kuroda, Hayato" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL statement PREPARE does not work in ECPG |
| Date: | 2019-05-22 10:07:35 |
| Message-ID: | d35a43eb925fcd2be233f07520320720a3721340.camel@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> This patch seems to have little incidence on the stability, but FWIW
> I
> am not cool with the concept of asking for objections and commit a
> patch only 4 hours after-the-fact, particularly after feature freeze.
This was only done to beat the pg_indent run as Tom pointed out. I
figured worse case we can revert the patch if people object.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ideriha, Takeshi | 2019-05-22 10:38:01 | RE: Global shared meta cache |
| Previous Message | Amit Khandekar | 2019-05-22 09:35:29 | Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys |