Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Nested Transaction TODO list

From: Haroldo Stenger <haroldo(dot)stenger(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Nested Transaction TODO list
Date: 2004-07-03 23:05:09
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 17:40:23 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> > Why does START have a different Node from BEGIN anyway?  This seems to
> > be a leftover from when people thought they should behave differently.
> > They are the same now, so there's no point in distinguishing them, or is it?
> [shrug...] I'd counsel leaving this as-is.  We've practically always
> regretted it when we made the parser discard information about what
> the user typed.  For instance, I was just reminded yesterday that we
> really ought to distinguish SortClauses created due to user ORDER BY
> clauses from those created because the parser silently added 'em.

How about simply documenting semantic equivalences, and making them
somewhat more explicit to the user?


Por favor registre haroldo(dot)stenger(at)gmail(dot)com como mi nueva y unica
direccion de correo en lugar de la vieja hstenger(at)adinet(dot)com(dot)uy
Please, record haroldo(dot)stenger(at)gmail(dot)com as my new and unique email
address instead of ye old hstenger(at)adinet(dot)com(dot)uy
Gracias. Thankyou.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Gavin SherryDate: 2004-07-04 00:31:33
Subject: Re: LinuxTag wrapup
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-07-03 21:40:23
Subject: Re: Nested Transaction TODO list

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group