Re: make more use of RoleSpec struct

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: make more use of RoleSpec struct
Date: 2016-12-29 15:57:27
Message-ID: d32f2cd1-e67a-4f5a-c6c5-f5ee55198c63@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/28/16 9:53 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Here is a small cleanup patch to make more use of the RoleSpec
>> struct/node throughout the parser to avoid casts and make the code more
>> self-documenting.
>
> This makes sense to me. I started to do this at some point when I was
> writing RoleSpec; eventually got annoyed about fixing the fallout (I was
> working to get somebody else's patch committed) and went back to how it
> is. Glad to see it done.
>
> The only functional issue might be the removal of the IsA() checks. If
> we don't cast any Node before passing it to any of those functions,
> there should be no problem because any misfeasance will be reported as a
> compile-time warning. Perhaps it's worth adding IsA() checks in loops
> such as the one in roleSpecsToIds().

Committed with an extra Assert there for good measure.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cynthia Shang 2016-12-29 16:43:34 Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-12-29 15:55:54 Re: Improving RLS planning