| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: logical replication access control patches |
| Date: | 2017-03-15 17:29:56 |
| Message-ID: | d32852e5-2c0a-cc73-c5de-3e9e8083a4cd@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/14/17 14:49, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> Not what I mean - owner should be able to publish table. If you are
> granted role of the owner you can do what owner can no?
I didn't actually know that ownership worked that way. You can grant
the role of an owner to someone, and then that someone has ownership
rights. So that should satisfy a pretty good range of use cases for who
can publish what tables.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2017-03-15 17:31:27 | Re: Parallel Bitmap scans a bit broken |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-03-15 17:27:30 | Re: pg_ls_waldir() & pg_ls_logdir() |