Re: Proper object locking for GRANT/REVOKE

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proper object locking for GRANT/REVOKE
Date: 2025-08-27 16:54:33
Message-ID: d2d96fe4-6b1c-4bd3-813b-c2cfcb4a79f4@eisentraut.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 26.08.25 18:21, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> +1 for the comment patch (0001-Improve-objectNamesToOids-comment.patch).
>
> +1 for also doing something like (0002-WIP-Attempt-to-put-back-intra-
> grant-inplace.spec-cov.patch), to keep the test coverage for the "cache
> lookup failed" error. Maybe add a new test for that, given that it's
> pretty hacky.
>
> Those are just comment and test updates, however, so they should not
> block the release. I will remove this from the Open Items list.

I have committed these two patches now.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2025-08-27 17:13:54 Re: ABI Compliance Checker GSoC Project
Previous Message Andres Freund 2025-08-27 16:18:27 Re: Buffer locking is special (hints, checksums, AIO writes)