From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Proper object locking for GRANT/REVOKE |
Date: | 2025-08-27 16:54:33 |
Message-ID: | d2d96fe4-6b1c-4bd3-813b-c2cfcb4a79f4@eisentraut.org |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 26.08.25 18:21, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> +1 for the comment patch (0001-Improve-objectNamesToOids-comment.patch).
>
> +1 for also doing something like (0002-WIP-Attempt-to-put-back-intra-
> grant-inplace.spec-cov.patch), to keep the test coverage for the "cache
> lookup failed" error. Maybe add a new test for that, given that it's
> pretty hacky.
>
> Those are just comment and test updates, however, so they should not
> block the release. I will remove this from the Open Items list.
I have committed these two patches now.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2025-08-27 17:13:54 | Re: ABI Compliance Checker GSoC Project |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2025-08-27 16:18:27 | Re: Buffer locking is special (hints, checksums, AIO writes) |