Re: BUG #15977: Inconsistent behavior in chained transactions

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: fn ln <emuser20140816(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #15977: Inconsistent behavior in chained transactions
Date: 2019-09-05 12:16:11
Message-ID: d2d5e3fc-cfe8-b7ba-d335-107a32c2b095@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On 2019-09-04 16:49, fn ln wrote:
> I made another patch for suggested behavior (COMMIT/ROLLBACK AND CHAIN
> now gives us an error when used in an implicit block).

I'm content with this patch. Better disable questionable cases now and
maybe re-enable them later if someone wants to make a case for it.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Euler Taveira 2019-09-05 12:31:38 Re: BUG #15992: Index size larger than the base table size. Sometime 3 times large
Previous Message PG Bug reporting form 2019-09-05 11:17:22 BUG #15992: Index size larger than the base table size. Sometime 3 times large

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-09-05 12:21:34 Re: Plug-in common/logging.h with vacuumlo and oid2name
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2019-09-05 10:17:36 Re: CVE-2017-7484-induced bugs, or, btree cmp functions are not leakproof?