Re: [PATCH] Replica sends an incorrect epoch in its hot standby feedback to the Master

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Palamadai, Eka" <ekanatha(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replica sends an incorrect epoch in its hot standby feedback to the Master
Date: 2020-03-03 13:02:51
Message-ID: d270ec02-da01-bc91-989e-52abb125c2e5@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/2/20 10:33 AM, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 8:15 PM Palamadai, Eka <ekanatha(at)amazon(dot)com
> <mailto:ekanatha(at)amazon(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> Please, do not top post on this list.
>
> Thanks a lot for the feedback. Please let me know if you have any
> further comments. Meanwhile, I have also added this patch to
> "Commitfest 2020-03" at https://commitfest.postgresql.org/27/2464.
>
>
> Apparently, there are a couple of duplicate entries in the commitfest
> as: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/27/2463/ and
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/27/2462/
>
> Could close those as "withdrawn"?

I have marked the duplicate entries 2462 and 2463 as withdrawn.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2020-03-03 13:05:42 Re: error context for vacuum to include block number
Previous Message Hamid Akhtar 2020-03-03 12:38:14 Re: Minor issues in .pgpass