Re: COPY as a set returning function

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: COPY as a set returning function
Date: 2017-01-28 02:43:10
Message-ID: d2294bdf-7274-47da-9bc4-a9972c7c8294@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/27/17 8:07 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> There are still neither regression tests nor SGML documentation.
>
> Are we at a point where we should add these things?

One could argue about the documentation at this point, since the
function is somewhat self-documenting for the time being. But surely
there should be tests.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2017-01-28 02:59:17 Re: Removing link-time cross-module refs in contrib
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-01-28 02:42:18 Re: COPY as a set returning function