Re: RFD: comp.databases.postgresql.general

From: "Gary L(dot) Burnore" <gburnore(at)databasix(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RFD: comp.databases.postgresql.general
Date: 2004-11-08 02:24:49
Message-ID: d1mto09te4qp00utrhhdecv6kpbtufrnai@4ax.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, 07 Nov 2004 21:16:05 GMT, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)bigpanda(dot)com>
wrote:

>Gary L. Burnore <gburnore(at)databasix(dot)com> wrote:
>>On Sun, 07 Nov 2004 19:26:42 GMT, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)bigpanda(dot)com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>"Robert G" <robertg07(at)excite(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Hello Mike. A number of us from the mailing list have been discussing
>>>>this on the back channel (e-mail). At least ten people that I am aware
>>>>of are not in favor of this idea. Your efforts are appreciated, to a
>>>>point, but I do prefer if you just left things well enough alone. You
>>>>took this initiative without notifying the mailing list proper. I saw
>>>>that you posted to the Newsgroup side, but your posts did not reach the
>>>>e-list. It is one-sided, and many of us prefer to keep it that way. A
>>>
>>>I personally haven't seen too much discussion on this subject on the mailing
>>>list proper, either (perhaps because the weekend traffic tends to be low) so
>>>I think it's too early to be saying things like "many of us" speaking for the
>>>mailing list.
>>>
>>>Besides which, AFAICT the mailing list gateway is not one-sided given that
>>>I seem to be able to post to my usenet server giving my subscribed email
>>>address and have it show up on the mailing list.
>>
>>
>>The groups aren't listed as moderated. Anyone who wants to post is
>>able to. Those not on the mailing list don't go through. That's the
>>problem.
>
>As far as I know, they do go through after moderation currently.
>
>As for "the problem," I can't figure out if you are speaking about the
>current state or the proposal. If the former, given that the current
>state is AFAIK that the groups have no status at all, I can't see how
>not being listed as moderated has any effect.

User makes a comment in USENet. Post gets seen on usenet servers
around the world. Moderator chooses not to approve. Post remains in
USENet, not in email list. Later, someone replies to usenet post.
Moderator accepts. Now people on list see that they didn't get to see
the post being replied to.

If the groups are moderated, the moderator gets _ALL_ posts before
they appear in the group.

--
gburnore(at)databasix dot com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
DataBasix | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ 3 4 1 4 2 ݳ޳ 6 9 0 6 9 ÝÛ³
Black Helicopter Repair Svcs Division | Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
Want one? GET one! http://signup.databasix.com
===========================================================================

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gary L. Burnore 2004-11-08 02:31:31 Re: I spoke with Marc from the postgresql mailing list.
Previous Message Gary L. Burnore 2004-11-08 02:14:39 Re: ALERT This mailing list may be voted into a