Re: replication in Postgres

From: "Jeff Larsen" <jlar310(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Vivek Khera" <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>
Cc: "PgSQL General ML" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: replication in Postgres
Date: 2007-11-26 17:50:08
Message-ID: d1f9b6f00711260950s3c28d560pc20e01427d60b678@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> > Yes, but I'd like something better than "near real time" as the above
> > page describes. Or maybe someone could clarify that.... Besides,
> > EnterpriseDB does not save me enough money. In my current commercial
> > DB, if a transaction is committed on the master, it is guaranteed to
> > be committed to the secondary. In our business, losing one customer
> > order could lose us the customer for good.
>
> So you want synchronous replication. Search on that term in the
> archives for possible solutions (or lack thereof) in postgres.
>
> If you don't specify your requirements clearly, don't expect useful
> advice ;-)

I'm not looking for advice. My original contribution to this thread
suggested a preferred course of future development. I know what my
options are with the present version, but I see room for improvement.

Jeff

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-11-26 17:55:09 Re: replication in Postgres
Previous Message Chris Browne 2007-11-26 17:39:42 Re: replication in Postgres