From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #2683: spi_exec_query in plperl returns column names which are not marked as UTF8 |
Date: | 2006-10-15 21:04:31 |
Message-ID: | d1517708621daa10e71874d2a6afebcd@biglumber.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tom Lane asked:
> Well, we're still supporting some OS versions that are way over five
> years old. ISTM the real question is what do we buy if we make such
> a restriction? Getting rid of a few small ifdefs doesn't seem like
> an adequate reason. Is there some major improvement we could make?
Well, as you just pointed out in the last commit, Unicode-aware hashes.
Unicode in general was cleaned up and overhauled in 5.8, so if pl/perl
is going to make a serious attempt to support it, it probably should
require 5.8.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200610151657
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFFMqG1vJuQZxSWSsgRApmpAJ9B29AhaBGnEA6h7o5FgemlrIUgzgCgtTZu
QZkaGYy0iH0JnHoZGoE/KRE=
=hgIs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-10-15 21:50:15 | Re: [HACKERS] BUG #2683: spi_exec_query in plperl returns |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-15 20:43:17 | Re: BUG #2683: spi_exec_query in plperl returns column names which are not marked as UTF8 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-10-15 21:16:43 | Re: Threaded python on FreeBSD |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-15 20:43:17 | Re: BUG #2683: spi_exec_query in plperl returns column names which are not marked as UTF8 |