| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: speed up a logical replica setup |
| Date: | 2024-01-22 06:55:04 |
| Message-ID: | d11e8cfb-b987-45d2-bf56-1e8552145b1c@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 18.01.24 10:37, Amit Kapila wrote:
> The other option could be pg_createsubscriber on the lines of
> pg_verifybackup and pg_combinebackup.
Yes, that spelling would be more consistent.
> Yet other options could be
> pg_buildsubscriber, pg_makesubscriber as 'build' or 'make' in the name
> sounds like we are doing some work to create the subscriber which I
> think is the case here.
I see your point here. pg_createsubscriber is not like createuser in
that it just runs an SQL command. It does something different than
CREATE SUBSCRIBER. So a different verb would make that clearer. Maybe
something from here: https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/convert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2024-01-22 06:58:30 | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-01-22 06:54:44 | Re: Test slots invalidations in 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl only if dead rows are removed |