Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?
Date: 2017-04-05 16:18:48
Message-ID: d0d90bc1-41c7-619d-19b3-4bcfd817155c@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/5/17 09:58, Robert Haas wrote:
>> - Maybe add a check to opr_sanity to make sure the default set of
>> functions is configured the way we want?
> That seems like a good idea.

patch

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Mark-immutable-functions-in-information-schema-as-pa.patch invalid/octet-stream 5.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-04-05 16:22:45 Re: [PATCH v1] Add and report the new "in_hot_standby" GUC pseudo-variable.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-04-05 16:14:05 Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql