From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Strip -mmacosx-version-min options from plperl build |
Date: | 2022-08-22 14:31:53 |
Message-ID: | d0ac4a3a-aaf8-009e-04ee-f6dc8cecc073@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 20.08.22 22:44, Andres Freund wrote:
> Maybe a daft question: Why do want any of the -l flags other than -lperl? With
> the patch configure spits out the following on my debian system:
>
> checking for CFLAGS to compile embedded Perl... -DDEBIAN
> checking for flags to link embedded Perl... -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.34/CORE -lperl -ldl -lm -lpthread -lc -lcrypt
>
> those libraries were likely relevant to build libperl, but don't look relevant
> for linking to it dynamically. Statically would be a different story, but we
> already insist on a shared build.
Looking inside the ExtUtils::Embed source code, I wonder if there are
some installations that have things like -lperl538 or something like
that that it wants to deal with.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-08-22 14:32:36 | Re: Strip -mmacosx-version-min options from plperl build |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-08-22 14:24:47 | Remove offsetof definition |