| From: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Shruthi Gowda <gowdashru(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade |
| Date: | 2022-08-02 19:19:39 |
| Message-ID: | d0a4f263-a774-394d-134f-4edce6a980e4@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/2/22 1:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> Given this appears to be resolved, I have removed this from "Open
>> Items". Thanks!
>
> Sadly, we're still not out of the woods. I see three buildfarm
> failures in this test since Robert resolved the "-X" problem [1][2][3]:
>
> Not sure what to make of this, except that maybe the test is telling
> us about an actual bug of exactly the kind it's designed to expose.
Looking at the test code, is there anything that could have changed the
relfrozenxid or relminxid independently of the test on these systems?
That said, I do think we should reopen the item to figure out what's
going on. Doing so now.
Jonathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-08-02 19:23:26 | Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade |
| Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2022-08-02 19:04:11 | Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations are accessed in a transaction |