| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box? |
| Date: | 2021-11-04 17:20:49 |
| Message-ID: | d0843e42-c379-c7e4-68c0-5c813d043912@oss.nttdata.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021/11/05 0:04, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 10:59 AM Bharath Rupireddy
> <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> With log_checkpoints=on, the "./initdb -D data" generates few
>> checkpoints logs [1]. I hope this is okay as it's a one-time thing per
>> database cluster. Thoughts?
>
> I think you should arrange to suppress that output.
+1
> I didn't spot any other problems on a quick read-through.
-bool log_checkpoints = false;
+bool log_checkpoints = true;
It's better to initialize the global variable Log_autovacuum_min_duration
with 600000 like the above change?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2021-11-04 17:49:47 | Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box? |
| Previous Message | gkokolatos | 2021-11-04 17:02:28 | Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression |