On Fri, 2026-06-05 at 20:46 +0000, Tristan Partin wrote:
> I would say proceed as you see fit. I guess I am generally of the
> opinion that additional testing is generally always better, but I
> don't
> want to push for something if others don't see the same value. I'd be
> happy to provide a patch for the test in a subsequent discussion if
> that
> is a good middle ground?
Yes, sounds good.
Regards,
Jeff Davis