Re: Question on creating keys on partitioned tables

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Siddharth Jain <siddhsql(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Question on creating keys on partitioned tables
Date: 2023-03-31 13:46:51
Message-ID: d0379fb1269069f2fc7823fb2414cf03b215fdaa.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 2023-03-30 at 17:05 -0700, Siddharth Jain wrote:
> I have this question. Say I create a partitioned table on column X.
>
> Option 1:
>
> I add a primary key on (X,Y). Y is another column. Even though Y is a globally unique PK (global meaning it is unique across partitions, not just in one partition), Postgres does not allow me to
> create a PK on Y in a partitioned table.
>
> Option 2:
>
> I add PK on Y on each of the partitions
>
> Are these not equivalent? If not, which is better and why?

No, they are not equivalent.

Option 2 comes closer to guaranteeing uniqueness for column X, so use that.

> PS: This is what my best friend had to say:
>
> [...] If you are using the "table inheritance" approach [...]

Don't even consider that. Declarative partitioning is so much better.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2023-03-31 13:55:35 Re: Cannot terminate backend
Previous Message Arnaud Lesauvage 2023-03-31 13:46:39 Cannot terminate backend