From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Siddharth Jain <siddhsql(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Question on creating keys on partitioned tables |
Date: | 2023-03-31 13:46:51 |
Message-ID: | d0379fb1269069f2fc7823fb2414cf03b215fdaa.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 2023-03-30 at 17:05 -0700, Siddharth Jain wrote:
> I have this question. Say I create a partitioned table on column X.
>
> Option 1:
>
> I add a primary key on (X,Y). Y is another column. Even though Y is a globally unique PK (global meaning it is unique across partitions, not just in one partition), Postgres does not allow me to
> create a PK on Y in a partitioned table.
>
> Option 2:
>
> I add PK on Y on each of the partitions
>
> Are these not equivalent? If not, which is better and why?
No, they are not equivalent.
Option 2 comes closer to guaranteeing uniqueness for column X, so use that.
> PS: This is what my best friend had to say:
>
> [...] If you are using the "table inheritance" approach [...]
Don't even consider that. Declarative partitioning is so much better.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2023-03-31 13:55:35 | Re: Cannot terminate backend |
Previous Message | Arnaud Lesauvage | 2023-03-31 13:46:39 | Cannot terminate backend |