Re: Allow table AMs to define their own reloptions

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Osama Abdul Qader <osamaabdulqader(dot)cs(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Ajit Awekar <ajitpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Tachoires <julien(at)tachoires(dot)me>
Subject: Re: Allow table AMs to define their own reloptions
Date: 2026-10-19 13:36:55
Message-ID: d02aaf01-c876-4e8b-ad7d-d882d08bcc48@dunslane.net
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2026-10-11 Su 2:24 PM, Osama Abdul Qader wrote:
> Hey Everyone,
>
> I've been following this thread since September 8, albeit passively,
> and I'm interested in contributing by reviewing the patches. Could you
> let me know if the work is still ongoing?
>
>
>

Please don't top-post.

Work is ongoing. I have just posted a v13 set.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Geier 2026-10-19 13:47:39 Re: Add compiler option -fstrict-flex-arrays=1
Previous Message Henson Choi 2026-10-19 13:32:52 Re: [DEPARSE] An alias named 'set' on an UPDATE, DELETE or MERGE target does not read back