| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Georgios <gkokolatos(at)protonmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik(at)garret(dot)ru>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: index prefetching |
| Date: | 2025-07-16 18:27:32 |
| Message-ID: | cmi77blt5rx2ggn63xy3i65dhu7gasp7fdf4dx3xzaii6ekvmu@57ft6uehpu5l |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2025-07-16 14:18:54 -0400, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I don't fully understand why this appears to be less of a problem with
> the complex patch. Can you help me to confirm my understanding?
Could you share the current version of the complex patch (happy with a git
tree)? Afaict it hasn't been posted, which makes this pretty hard follow along
/ provide feedback on, for others.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2025-07-16 18:30:05 | Re: index prefetching |
| Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2025-07-16 18:23:51 | Re: Improving and extending int128.h to more of numeric.c |