Re: About System Catalogs

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: About System Catalogs
Date: 2004-10-23 09:01:34
Message-ID: cld6lk$s5p$1@floppy.pyrenet.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Thomas Swan wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>Francesco(dot)Borgoglio(at)cedacri(dot)it writes:
>>
>>
>>>2) As i had a very large pg_largeogject, i deleted rows e now i have a
>>>clean, small table.
>>> The table is empty but its index pg_largeogject_loid_pn_index lasts
>>>to retain a lot of bytes.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>REINDEX should fix this.
>>
>>
>>
> Is REINDEX still going to be a necessity in the 8.0 release? I
> remembered at there was a discussion on the mailing list about a fix or
> need to fix VACUUM so that manually reindexing would not be necessary...
>

This is already true for the 7.4, I don't remember that vacuum was improved
int that direction in the 8.0.

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message aditya s 2004-10-25 02:21:26 pgsql replicator
Previous Message Thomas Swan 2004-10-23 02:50:43 Re: About System Catalogs