| From: | gkokolatos(at)pm(dot)me |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression |
| Date: | 2021-11-01 08:39:59 |
| Message-ID: | ckv-SMbj007n51oOS99W6bUCnNvGr4L93Ucse0iTtVj8xSr6_Ws-Zbd6yY4QMUjQHryR4WiemSre8biogFTg1L1kxaYr2FdNZVx-YmTcW5g=@pm.me |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Monday, November 1st, 2021 at 9:09 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 08:38:33PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> It would be good to test with many segments, but could we think about
> just relying on LZ4F_decompress() with a frame and compute the
> decompressed size by ourselves? At least that will never break, and
> that would work in all the cases aimed by pg_receivewal.
Agreed.
I have already started on v8 of the patch with that technique. I should
be able to update the thread soon.
>
> Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2021-11-01 09:01:13 | Re: wait event and archive_command |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-11-01 08:09:08 | Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression |